PWG Business News: Your Gateway to Market Intelligence
PWG Business News is committed to providing real-time updates and expert-driven insights across various industries, including technology, healthcare, finance, energy, automotive, and consumer goods. We deliver carefully curated news, financial reports, and research-based updates, helping businesses and professionals stay informed and competitive in today’s dynamic business environment.
Our News section covers industry-shaping events such as market expansions, new product launches, mergers and acquisitions, policy shifts, and corporate earnings, offering a strategic advantage to decision-makers seeking actionable intelligence. By bridging industry leaders, stakeholders, and professionals with data-driven content, we empower our audience to navigate the complexities of the global market with confidence.
PWG Business News: Keeping You Ahead in the Business World
At PWG Business News, we deliver timely and credible business news, covering global market trends, economic shifts, and emerging opportunities. With comprehensive coverage spanning healthcare, technology, telecommunications, utilities, materials, chemicals, and financials, our platform provides accurate, well-researched insights that drive success for executives, investors, and industry professionals alike.
Whether you're tracking regulatory updates, innovation trends, or strategic collaborations, PWG Business News ensures you have access to high-quality, data-backed reports that enhance brand visibility, credibility, and engagement. Our mission is to keep you ahead by serving as your trusted source for impactful industry news and market intelligence.
Stay informed with PWG Business News – your gateway to the insights that shape the future of business.
Financials
The foreign exchange (forex) market scandal, which has been making headlines since its discovery in the early 2010s, has reached a pivotal moment in the UK legal system. Major British banks, including Barclays and NatWest, along with international giants Citibank and JPMorgan, have taken their case to the Supreme Court in an attempt to overturn a decision that could potentially lead to a significant payout to affected consumers. The case centers around allegations of forex rigging by these banks, which could result in damages of up to £2.7 billion for companies and individuals impacted by their actions.
The forex rigging scandal involves several large banking institutions colluding to manipulate exchange rates for their financial benefit, affecting transactions in major currencies like the British Pound. The European Commission has identified these activities as illegal, finding that banks formed cartels to coordinate their trading activities between 2007 and 2013. This widespread manipulation of the forex market has led to significant financial losses for businesses and individuals who engaged in currency transactions during this period.
The legal battle against these banks began with investigations by regulatory bodies, including the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the European Commission (EC). The FCA, along with other international regulators, imposed substantial fines on several banks in 2014 for their involvement in forex manipulation. These fines totaled £1.1 billion and were levied against banks such as Citibank, HSBC, JPMorgan, RBS (now part of NatWest), and UBS.
In 2019, a group action lawsuit was launched in the UK by a former Which? policy adviser, Phillip Evans, backed by law firm Hausfeld. This lawsuit seeks compensation for those who conducted spot or outward forward transactions involving major currencies. The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) initially decided that such claims could only proceed on an opt-in basis, requiring victims to actively join the case. However, the Court of Appeal later overturned this decision, allowing claims to proceed on an opt-out basis, thus potentially involving thousands more claimants without needing their explicit consent.
The decision by the Court of Appeal has sparked a crucial appeal to the Supreme Court by the implicated banks. The Supreme Court hearing aims to address two primary legal issues:
Opt-in vs. Opt-out Claims: The banks argue that the Court of Appeal erred in overturning the CAT's ruling on the opt-in requirement. If the banks succeed, the decision could revert to requiring claimants to actively opt-in, significantly limiting the scope of the lawsuit.
Principles Underlying Collective Proceedings: The second issue centers on whether the Court of Appeal was correct in considering broader principles related to collective action suits when making its decision. The banks contend that these factors were inappropriately emphasized.
This high-stakes case has significant implications for both the implicated banks and the thousands of entities potentially affected by their actions. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of the banks, the possibility of recovering damages for claimants becomes much more challenging. Conversely, if the decision supports the current opt-out approach, it could pave the way for one of the largest group actions in British legal history, with a potential payout exceeding £2.7 billion.
Barclays: A major player in the forex market, Barclays is one of the banks at the center of the scandal.
NatWest: As part of the RBS group, NatWest's predecessor was involved in the forex manipulation.
Citibank: The U.S.-based bank was fined for its role in the scandal, alongside other international entities.
JPMorgan: Another prominent U.S. bank, JPMorgan has faced scrutiny for its participation in forex rigging.
The forex market, valued at over $6 trillion daily, is a critical component of global finance. The ongoing case highlights the importance of fair market practices and the need for robust regulatory oversight to prevent such abuses in the future. As banks continue to navigate the legal complexities of this scandal, the broader financial community watches with keen interest, recognizing the potential consequences for bank reputation and financial stability.
As the Supreme Court weighs the arguments presented by both sides, the outcome of this case will set a precedent for future collective actions related to financial misconduct. The verdict will not only determine the fate of thousands of claimants but also influence how regulatory bodies handle similar cases in the future. The international implications of this decision are far-reaching, as it will impact how banks engage in global financial markets and the measures in place to prevent future abuses.
Given the complexity and the high stakes involved, this case underscores the evolving landscape of financial regulation and consumer protection in the UK and beyond. Whether the ruling favors the banks or the claimants, it will undoubtedly shape the future of financial law and practice in major markets worldwide.
